false
OasisLMS
Catalog
(FIT)-Module 5 Workshop 8: Device Cases
Poole Case 7 Answer
Poole Case 7 Answer
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
The video discusses why a 25-joule shock is insufficient to reliably defibrillate ventricular fibrillation (VF). It explains that detection and confirmation processes in an ICD (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator) determine when to administer a synchronized R-wave shock. The timing of the shock is crucial to prevent it from falling within the heart's vulnerable period, which could induce VF. In this case, the shock was delivered during this period, leading to VF due to its upper limit of ventricular vulnerability being above 25 joules. Hence, a 25-joule shock is unreliable, aligning with the discussed answer of C.
Keywords
25-joule shock
ventricular fibrillation
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
synchronized R-wave shock
ventricular vulnerability
×
Please select your language
1
English